The book is made of two parts: the first one is a detailed exploration of the litterature around Pasteur’s rise from obscurity to fame and of the corresponding. The Pasteurization of France [Bruno Latour, Alan Sheridan, John Law] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. What can one man accomplish. The pasteurization of France: Bruno Latour, translated by Alan Sheridan and John Law (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.

Author: Nikojinn Dagor
Country: Latvia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 19 August 2007
Pages: 50
PDF File Size: 14.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.82 Mb
ISBN: 810-2-89399-674-1
Downloads: 38689
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Manris

The Pasteurization of France

English View all editions and formats Summary: Katour, no one — except extreme cynics — can doubt the value of Pasteur’s discoveries to medicine. It has no central argument.

In particular, they do not wait for the sociologist to define for them the society in which they live. With such a model, we must attribute to Pasteur’s laboratory the totality of the force and regard as inert masses all the social groups that are capable only of trans- mitting the force or absorbing part of it it is said of them that they “adapt to progress” or “resist”.

Koch and Peter Nothing demonstrates better the unanimity of the crowds that fol- lowed Pasteur and seized on his results than the few people who had what might be called the courage to oppose them. Harvard University Press- Science – pages. You Will Be Pasteurs of Microbes! At the Academie he cries out: Home About Help Search.

Full text of “Bruno Latour The Pasteurization Of France ( )”

The conflict between health and wealth was resolved to the benefit of the latter. The first section of the book, which retells the story of Pasteur, is a vivid description of an approach to science whose theoretical implications go far beyond a particular case study.

Yet Pasteur was not the only scientist working on the relationships of microbes and disease. They are all cre- ating — this is the important point — new sources of power and new sources of legitimacy, which are irreducible to those that hitherto coded the so-called political space.


Their trust went entirely to the man who was enunciating a general law and a principle of indefinite extension of the networks that they were going to command. The small group of Pasteurian researchers created neither medicine, nor the huge body of franxe on the causes of epidemics, nor the statistics, nor the determination pastekrization the social body to sanitize passteurization remodel itself, nor even the rapid understanding by others of what they said.

Against everything at once, but with no certainty of success. But where does Fuchs strike? Koch did not share the same weaknesses, and he attacked Pasteur far from Paris and on the terrain of the new scientific medicine. Franfe, biologists, sur- geons, sanitary engineers, veterinary surgeons, physiologists like Claude Bernard, medical doctors, and military doctors, as well as tuberculosis, cholera, diphtheria, tetanus, yellow fever, rabies, and the plague, all move according to different paths, offering us the sort of interesting confusion that Tolstoy describes in the battles of his book.

You will be Pastures of Microbes. How was he able to galvanize the other forces to support his own research?

We must analyze bruo beliefs in the power of what is in germ in the same terms as when Koch, proposing a vaccine against tubercu- losis at the International Congress of Medecine inis besieged by patients from all over Europe possessed of the hope of being cured. The immense trust in Pasteur derived partly from the work that he had done fraancewhich did not concern infectious dis- eases, and partly from the social movement that needed these dis- coveries but went well beyond them without waiting for them to be made.

You may have already requested this item. Only a non modern can use these concepts while investigating microbes and wars. Going against much of the crowd, the first part of the work has significantly more substance than his ‘Irreductions. Medicine pasteuurization Last 4. Once the shift has been made, it is crucial to decide who was ultimately the cause of this transaction. Quotes from The Pasteurizatio So- ciety is not made up just of men, for everywhere microbes intervene rbuno act.


Appealing to an example from an earlier period might Francr 7 help us find a way out. He should not try to be reasonable and to impose some pre- determined sociology on the sometimes bizarre interdefinition offered by the writers studied. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. Without the microbe, without vaccine, even without the doctrine of contagion or the variation in virulence, everything that was done could have been done: Thanks to the prowess of this agent, Fuchs sets about linking two hitherto unconnected sta- tistical aggregates, the presence of disease and gonorrhoea in the mother.

So with that in mind I have some problem with your sentence: Peter fought bravely, but he miscalculated the balance of forces and was therefore to sink into ridicule. Contents Introduction Materials and Methods. For whom must we “make room”? No one can deny that in this stock was extremely limited. But the secondary mechanism attributes the whole of the sanitational revolution of the period to Pasteur’s genius. Many of the characteristics of so-called pre-Pasteur hygiene are to ghe ex- plained by this situation.

The Pasteurization of France | JAMA | JAMA Network

As Leduc puts it: What has made them visible? You may send this fracne to up to five recipients. The yearwe claim, is after Please enter recipient e-mail address es. Sign in to access your subscriptions Sign in to your personal account.

Hitherto, especially in the tropics, they could never go very far.

This is very annoying.