Base Legal. Decreto · Ley · Reglamento Base legal del Sistema de Transparencia. Ley · Reglamento · Ley Fax (Animal Welfare in Bovine, Ovine and Swine Establishments); and ] and [Chile’s Decreto No 94/ Reglamento sobre. 76  – Decree “Rules of Procedure on Labor Relations,” the.
|Published (Last):||26 January 2016|
|PDF File Size:||2.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A move to a system requiring the collection of precise data on costs, based on actual time spent on each operator, would have a more significant financial impact on MS. Increased efficiency of the risk based use of control resources and mobilisation of dedicated financial resources reducing pressure on national finances allow progress towards the primary objective of maintaining efficient controls and safety of the agri-food chain.
The objective of ensuring a sustainable financing of controls via full cost recovery would, in most if not all Member States, be undermined, as controls will xecreto need to be carried out on all operators at a frequency dictated by the risk. Despite decrto above integrated approach, for historical reasons controls for animal health purposes both on domestic and imported goods and controls on residues of veterinary medicines, remained regulated separately. Therefore, besides a transitional period for the accreditation of all laboratories granted for 4 years, ending inthe Commission extended such a transitional period until 31 December for the accreditation of laboratories tasked with Trichinella testing and located in a slaughterhouse or a game handling establishment.
On the contrary, effects are likely to be more significant in those MS which do not.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
532-09 costs are expected to be affordable by public budgets see box 7 below for estimations provided by 2 MS. Data available from MS currently charging such fees shows that when these are levied upon all operators subject to controls irrespective of whether an inspection is actually carried out during a reference period the amounts are modulated according to the size or the throughput of the business and represent 523-0 rather negligible fraction of production costs.
Innovation – By allowing in certain cases the use of methods not yet included in the scope of the accreditation of an official laboratory, Option 1 would remove legal obstacles to the introduction and development of new analytical methods.
The same result, however, could be obtained by ensuring a clear definition of eligible costs, transparency of full cost recovery requirements and thus the accountability of the fees system as a whole, which would enable the public and operators in particular to appreciate decreot costs are identified and charged and how fees are calculated and used. The specific objectives address the two sets of obstacles mentioned above, i. Another area in which the objective of the Regulation is not fully achieved by MS is the financing of official controls.
Eurogroup provided the Commission with a detailed proposition on how to improve the level of decrrto throughout the Regulation.
In addition to the elements of option 2, option 3 would widen the scope of the Regulation to cover sectors of the agri-food chain acquis that are currently excluded plant health law, PRM legislation, ABP rules and complete the ‘integration’ of agri-food chain official controls. The specific objectives were set with the aim of eliminating the specific obstacles identified during the analysis which prevent or hamper the achievement of the general objectives in this area.
edcreto However, the continuous and timely adjustment of the control effort at the EU border to the needs dictated by the actual risk is hampered by the rigidity and fragmentation of existing rules governing border checks in the different areas. An option based on full harmonisation of fees across MS i.
One of the aims of the review is to simplify legislative burdens in light of comments made by MS and food business operators on the existing regime.
A data decretk exercise was also conducted with regard to additional burdens to MS authorities and operators that could result from 1 a possible link of plant and plant products imports to the TRACES system, 2 the cost of mandatory accreditation of laboratories for methods related to plant health and 3 the cost dexreto setting up EU reference laboratories for plant health.
Similarly, the lack of integration of the different control structures operating at the border also prevents efficiency gains and savings in administrative costs to be reflected in lower fees being charged on operators. They also fail to address the unfairness and discriminatory character of the current financing system and the resulting lack of legitimacy. In light of the assessment above, it is considered that Option 4 i.
In addition two task forces with a limited number of Member States representatives were held Official controls carried out eecreto EU external borders on certain goods arriving from third countries, and official controls on residues of veterinary medicines decrfto not aligned to the risk based approach.
EUR-Lex – SC – EN – EUR-Lex
Increase the number of cases where cross-border enforcement cases are resolved through administrative assistance and cooperation. The increase in the level of mandatory fees would vary depending on the current recovery rate see Figure 4 below. This allows one to postulate the level of fees in a full cost recovery scenario.
Administrative burden and disproportionate requirements Reduce administrative burden and remove unnecessary requirements.
Levels of cost recovery are unknown for three MS. In addition, the repeal of this Directive would eliminate the obligations identified as administrative burden.
Under this Option each 52309 is given the possibility to determine the approach it follows as regards the funding of official control activities, provided that it ensures a level of resources which allows the correct implementation of control requirements and the efficient enforcement of EU law. Cost based fees are in fact proportional to the resources deployed during the performance of official controls and when levied on micro-enterprises, all other things being equal, they should be comparatively lower than those charged on larger operators.
Evidence suggests that the increase in costs for those individual operators in 53-09 which would be covered by the extended scope of mandatory fees is likely to be of little significance for the overall production costs.
The EU’s ability to export towards third countries relies on the reputation of the high production decrsto and added value that the EU goods can prove to have compared to the ones produced outside Europe.
The Regulation includes some important principles and mechanisms which are currently underused by MS’ CAs or applied according to divergent practices among MS.
The legislative framework is improved and streamlined, plant health and PRM, and ABP are included in its scope, mandatory fees are extended to cover key areas of the decreyo chain with the possibility for MS to refund fees paid by micro-enterprises.
The possibility for MS to alleviate the impact of full cost recovery on micro-entreprises by refunding them the mandatory fees paid, on condition that decreyo is in conformity with State aid rules i. To ensure harmonised verification of compliance with EU agri-food chain rules, MS are required to carry out official controls on certain goods coming from third countries at the external borders of the EU EU border controls.