The Ending of Time has ratings and 26 reviews. Timothy said: Dialogs between David Bohm and J. Krishnamurti, enjoyable and provoking on the nature of. KRISHNAMURTI: How shall we start? I would like to ask if humanity has taken a wrong turn. DAVID BOHM: A wrong turn? Well it must have done so, a long time. The Ending of Time Chapter 11 18th September Conversation with Prof. David Bohm ‘The Ending of `psychological’ Knowledge’. KRISHNAMURTI: What.
|Published (Last):||9 January 2018|
|PDF File Size:||13.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If we accept that we are fragmented, we will inevitably want to be totally secure, because being fragmented we are always in danger. Let’s put it that way. Ships from and sold by Amazon. We are speaking psychologically. Is it so heavily conditioned that it cannot see its way out of it, because, by constant repetition, the brain has become dull?
What we mean by disorder is another question. We are talking of compassion. It may take time in the sense that, if wrong connections hade been made, it is going to ov time to redistribute the material. Would you, as a scientist, accept such a state, or say that the man who talks of it is cuckoo?
The Book of Life: Somebody says, one can live this way; life has an extraordinary meaning in kriehnamurti, full of compassion, etc. I think this leaves out something that you brought up earlier – the question of the damage of scars to the brain.
If we say that we have knowledge of some object, like the microphone, that has some limited significance. The point is that knowledge seems to work unawares, simply waiting, and then acting, by which time it has jicdu the order of the brain. If we simply did away with it in a cessation of thought what solutions would come forth?
Ending of Time, The
But how are people to see that, because a person who is experiencing grief feels that it is his personal grief? Everybody says this person is intelligent, and that one is not. I realize logically, sanely, that what krishamurti are saying is accurate, true, logical, and I see the importance of it, but the wall is so strong and dominant and powerful that Endimg can’t get beyond it.
That is appallingly frightening. In listening, there is only pure observation.
Ending of Time, The – J. Krishnamurti Online
Well as a matter of fact I would! I have a certain purpose for which I create an order, and when the purpose is over I set aside that order or pattern. You are telling him about something which must be enormously important, because you have given your life to it. I am not using any kind of pressure, or reward; my responsibility is that I can’t let another human being go.
Krishnamurti left a large body of literature in the form of public talks, writings, discussions with teachers and students, with scientists and religious figures, conversations with individuals, television and radio interviews, and letters. Read reviews that mention david bohm ending of time krishnamurti message krishnamurti and bohm dialogue human understanding ego future beyond claims process reality truth concepts deep discussed krishnaurti insight knowledge.
K is bound to change the world by its grace and not through middu or intellectual understanding. But we are not krishnwmurti this particular area.
I am asking you, as a scientist, is the universe based on time? So we come to that point that we discussed earlier; what then is meditation? What does that really mean? And if you say, wipe that out, what have I left?
One wants pleasure all the time. Obviously attention is not concentration. What do you mean by theory? You say the self is always krishnamurri same. It is brain damage which causes this emphasis on pleasure, as well as the fear and the anger.
Is it possible to gather a certain amount of order in a pattern sense, artificially, so that it gives rise to a certain amount of insight?
There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Can enfing entanglement be unravelled, freed, so that the universe is the mind? I couldn’t help but to feel this is an erroneous presupposition, while tempting, it seems to necessarily lead to the very desire and becoming that both Bohm and Krishnamurti are speaking against– a psychological becoming where humanity may w Dialogs between David Bohm and J. If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
For example, if there is lack of food, what we have to do is to find ways and means of producing more. You see it can all become mechanical. Which means, am I putting pressure jkddu him? It isn’t, but the illusion has great power. How can one, if one has that intelligence, that compassion, that love, which is not of a country, a person, an ideal or a saviour, transmit that purity to krishnxmurti Sep 27, James rated it krishnamudti liked it Shelves: No, I wouldn’t say that.
What makes the mind always follow a certain pattern?
The Ending of Time by Jiddu Krishnamurti
With what knowledge do I question my knowledge? Men use this marvellous technology to kill each other.
The discussion on the brain some 35 years later sound quite strange and out of place given the advances in brain science, but I think they feel more out of place being voiced by two non-experts in the field with undue confidence. Yes, mathematics itself is order.