Since its adoption, the Fisheries Law of , (Ley de Pesca, , “Fisheries Law”) has been .. Decreto Nº /09 – Ley general de aguas. 77 | GRass wal, LEY NO 2 . 63 Bodie T T – Bridgeport M – – 09 CEDARVILLE . ост”виг | guг”L” | ид”эoz | 9ьс’иэ | л9″87 оy;”Ley | o67″8 “ct og7″L. 06? . 94 . оy gy С99 98 9 9 91 09 gaT уg9″g б66″1 02 ое | гдо”g 09
|Published (Last):||1 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||15.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The principle has been succinctly stated in Re. He is not aware who had made overwriting on lej 7 at point X5 and states that the ticket mark X2 was not purchased from ticket window but from a broker.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia
118-09 Pradeep went to Village Khera Kalan along with accused Sushil Sushi who was on police custody remand and they went to the village in government vehicle 1810-9 no. According to the witness, he is not aware if Bhola does not know how to drive.
Therefore, I hereby hold that the prosecution has not been able to prove and St. The accused Mukesh Bhola, Sanjeev, Vishal and Vijay have stated that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the St.
He has denied that he was concealing the true facts of the case during the period of his investigation. A parcel number as for example ‘”, would mean Book 3 of the Assessor s Maps, Block Map 36, Block 3 and Parcel 5 within that block.
In a case resting on circumstantial evidence if the accused fails to offer a reasonable explanation in discharge of the burden placed on him, that itself provides an additional link in the chain of leh proved against him.
The Official Athletics Site of the Ragin’ Cajuns
According to the witness, he received the said parcels vide entry No. The witness has proved St. The witness has also deposed that the bike of Bhola was not required by him due to which reason he did not take his bike and left the same where it was standing.
Savita has deposed that on He does not remember which day of the week it was. He has denied the suggestion that in order to save the accused persons he was not telling the facts mentioned in his statement or that he had been won over by the accused persons. He has further deposed that first of all a police officer of Police Station Samaypur Badli recorded his identification statement Ex. CP Licensing vide Ex.
This witness has further deposed that St. Shankarnarayanan Senior Scientific Officer Biology has deposed that on The most material independent witnesses Ajay who could have corroborated the testimony of Sachin Prakash to the effect that he and Sachin had gone away on the bike of Sachin, has neither been cited as a witness nor examined to prove the aforesaid aspect. The witness has further deposed that he deposited the exhibits in the malkhana of Police Station Samaypur Badli and thereafter he prepared the brief facts which are Ex.
He has testified that the accused Sandeep Baba was the person who pointed out the katta on the back of his brother.
He has also deposed that the country made pistol marked F1 is firearm and the deformed bullet marked EB1 was part of a ammunition as defined under Arms Act. Saurabh Kumar has deposed that on According to the witness, on He has further testified that he did not physically point out the motorcycle of Bhola parked at Sanjay Enclave to the police and has voluntarily stated that he only surrendered the keys and RC of the motorcycle to the police and gave them the details of the place where it was parked.
Ly for the accused and hence, his testimony has gone leey.
Page 11 — Santa Cruz Sentinel 4 June — California Digital Newspaper Collection
This witness has further deposed that on Parcel 8 Parcel Thus, if a person is last seen with the deceased, he must offer an explanation as to how and when he parted company.
The Forensic Evidence indicates that either the offence had taken place in the Car or after the offence had taken place the body of the deceased had been carried in the car to some other place and thereafter parked at the place where it was found recovered. Counsels and hence her testimony has gone uncontroverted. According to him, at about 1. The witness has admitted that he had gone to the 181-90 station on the asking of the Investigating Officer. It is also the case of the prosecution that on the next day one Rajan who is the brother in law sala of Mohd.
He is aware the distance between Azadpur Mandi and Uttam Nagar where he was working ldy states that he was not working with his Jijaji.
According to the witness, he did not do so even after summoning the Crime Team and that he informed Police Station Jahangirpuri on phone nor did he sent the details of the recovery of dead body from the well. MM Tis Hazari Courts where he moved an application for interrogation of aforesaid accused persons and after taking permission 18-09 formally arrested them vide memos Ex.
Santa Cruz Sentinel, Volume 106, Number 131, 4 June 1962 — Page 11
According to the witness, he is not known to Sushil. The ly has also deposed that SI Rakesh warned the occupant if the door was not opened, they would break open the same and in the meanwhile one lady from the said flat opened the lock as well as the door.
Ismail, he saw one of the St. Counsel for the accused persons and hence, his testimony has gone uncontroverted. According to this witness, there was nobody at the tube well so he did not ask any body to join the investigations. Ismail PW3 had concealed while deposing in the Court which has been proved. Yadav has deposed that on